2009 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1968 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 5,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (332 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1968 Jaguar 240. (131 HP @ 5550 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1968 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 330 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (498 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Jaguar 240. (204 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1968 Jaguar 240 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Tahoe | 240 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5999 cc | 2483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 332 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Torque | 498 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 12.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 54 L |