2009 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1969 Renault 4
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Renault 4 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (320 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 287 more horse power than 1969 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1969 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1550 kg more than 1969 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Renault 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1969 Renault 4 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Tahoe | 4 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 745 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 60 L |