2009 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1970 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (320 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1970 Datsun 240Z. (151 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1970 Datsun 240Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 193 kg more than 1970 Datsun 240Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Datsun 240Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (461 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Datsun 240Z. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Datsun 240Z.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1970 Datsun 240Z | |
Make | Chevrolet | Datsun |
Model | Tahoe | 240Z |
Year Released | 2009 | 1970 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 461 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1068 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2300 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 11 L/100km |