2009 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1976 Volvo 240
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (310 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 240. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Volvo 240 weights approximately 79 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (454 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 240. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1976 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Tahoe | 240 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 310 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 454 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2650 mm |