2009 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1986 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 375 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1986 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | Tahoe | Cougar |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2650 mm |