2009 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1989 Matra-Simca M25
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Matra-Simca M25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Matra-Simca M25 would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Matra-Simca M25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (427 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Matra-Simca M25. (363 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Matra-Simca M25. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe has automatic transmission and 1989 Matra-Simca M25 has manual transmission. 1989 Matra-Simca M25 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1989 Matra-Simca M25 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Matra-Simca |
Model | Tahoe | M25 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5328 cc | 1764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 284 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 427 Nm | 363 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |