2009 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1995 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (311 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1995 Ford Windstar. (155 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Windstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Windstar weights approximately 141 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (454 Nm) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Windstar. (220 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Windstar.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1995 Ford Windstar | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Tahoe | Windstar |
Year Released | 2009 | 1995 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 3797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 454 Nm | 220 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 1690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1920 mm |