2009 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (320 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1015 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (462 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1995 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
| Model | Tahoe | 200 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5300 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 462 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2100 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1410 mm |
