2009 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1997 Mazda SW-X
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda SW-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda SW-X would be higher.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda SW-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1997 Mazda SW-X | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Tahoe | SW-X |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1105 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 55 L |
