2009 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2000 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1232 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (427 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Astro. (339 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | 2000 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
Model | Tahoe | Astro |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5328 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 284 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 427 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2419 kg | 1187 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2070 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1970 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 64 L |