2009 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2000 Honda J-VX
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda J-VX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda J-VX would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (321 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 2000 Honda J-VX. (104 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda J-VX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda J-VX weights approximately 360 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda J-VX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (461 Nm) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda J-VX. (144 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda J-VX.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | 2000 Honda J-VX | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Tahoe | J-VX |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 999 cc |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 461 Nm | 144 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1465 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2720 mm |