2009 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2002 Honda Integra
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Honda Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Honda Integra would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (320 HP) has 103 more horse power than 2002 Honda Integra. (217 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Integra.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Honda Integra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe has automatic transmission and 2002 Honda Integra has manual transmission. 2002 Honda Integra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | 2002 Honda Integra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Tahoe | Integra |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 217 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4374 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1725 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 50 L |