2009 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 5,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (332 HP) has 177 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Sable. (155 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Sable weights approximately 408 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (498 Nm) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercury Sable. (251 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | Tahoe | Sable |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5999 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 332 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 498 Nm | 251 Nm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.9 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.9 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 68 L |