2009 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe. (310 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe.
Because 2012 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (454 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi RS3. (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi RS3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Audi |
Model | Tahoe | RS3 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 310 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 454 Nm | 450 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |