2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1951 Toyota SA
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Toyota SA would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (281 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 254 more horse power than 1951 Toyota SA. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1951 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 379 kg more than 1951 Toyota SA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1951 Toyota SA | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | TrailBlazer | SA |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4161 cc | 995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 281 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2410 mm |
