2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1956 Lotus 11
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Lotus 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Lotus 11 would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (285 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1956 Lotus 11. (74 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1956 Lotus 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 881 kg more than 1956 Lotus 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1956 Lotus 11 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | TrailBlazer | 11 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 1100 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2160 mm |