2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 364 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 600 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
Model | TrailBlazer | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5999 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 666 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 33 L |