2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1968 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (286 HP) has 205 more horse power than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 34 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (374 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1968 Isuzu Bellel | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Isuzu |
| Model | TrailBlazer | Bellel |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4161 cc | 1991 cc |
| Horse Power | 286 HP | 81 HP |
| Torque | 374 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 40 L |
