2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1976 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (285 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. (33 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 721 kg more than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (374 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 332 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. (42 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1976 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | TrailBlazer | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
| Engine Size | 4161 cc | 356 cc |
| Horse Power | 285 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 374 Nm | 42 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 545 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2040 mm |
