2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1977 Volvo 164

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (286 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1977 Volvo 164. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1977 Volvo 164.

Because 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Volvo 164. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (374 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Volvo 164. (204 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Volvo 164.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer 1977 Volvo 164
Make Chevrolet Volvo
Model TrailBlazer 164
Year Released 2009 1977
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4161 cc 2664 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 286 HP 138 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 374 Nm 204 Nm
Torque RPM 4600 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 5610 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1850 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 3350 mm