2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1980 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (286 HP) has 227 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 71 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (374 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1980 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | TrailBlazer | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 286 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 374 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2530 mm |