2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1982 Renault 5
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 5 would be higher. At 5,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 531 kg more than 1982 Renault 5.
Because 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer has automatic transmission and 1982 Renault 5 has manual transmission. 1982 Renault 5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1982 Renault 5 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | TrailBlazer | 5 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5999 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2410 mm |