2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1982 Toyota Starlet
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Starlet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Starlet would be higher. At 4,159 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (285 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Starlet. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Starlet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 566 kg more than 1982 Toyota Starlet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1982 Toyota Starlet | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | TrailBlazer | Starlet |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4159 cc | 993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 75 L |