2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1983 Renault 9
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Renault 9 would be higher. At 4,155 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (269 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1983 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1333 kg more than 1983 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1983 Renault 9 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | TrailBlazer | 9 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4155 cc | 1107 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2153 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 38 L |