2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1993 Rover 200
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (285 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1993 Rover 200. (121 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 221 kg more than 1993 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (374 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Rover 200. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1993 Rover 200 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | TrailBlazer | 200 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 121 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 374 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2510 mm |