2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 4,155 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (269 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Because 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | TrailBlazer | FTO |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4155 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 269 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 202 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 192 km/hour | 226 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1300 mm |
