2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2000 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 694 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Because 2000 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Yukon (442 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (374 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2000 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Chevrolet | GMC |
Model | TrailBlazer | Yukon |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4159 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 374 Nm | 442 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2990 mm |