2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2001 Nissan Alpha
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan Alpha. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan Alpha would be higher. At 5,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2001 Nissan Alpha. (301 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan Alpha. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan Alpha weights approximately 19 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (542 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan Alpha. (359 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan Alpha.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2001 Nissan Alpha | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | TrailBlazer | Alpha |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5999 cc | 4490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 359 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2660 mm |
