2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2001 Nissan Chappo
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan Chappo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan Chappo would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (286 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 2001 Nissan Chappo. (155 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan Chappo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan Chappo weights approximately 24 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Because 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Nissan Chappo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (374 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan Chappo. (359 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan Chappo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2001 Nissan Chappo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | TrailBlazer | Chappo |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 2953 cc |
Horse Power | 286 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 374 Nm | 359 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 80 L |