2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2002 Spyker C8
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 116 kg more than 2002 Spyker C8.
Because 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Spyker C8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2002 Spyker C8 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Spyker |
Model | TrailBlazer | C8 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 4172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1090 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 100 L |