2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2004 Mercury Mountaineer

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (281 HP) has 41 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 460 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.

Because 2004 Mercury Mountaineer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer (382 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (276 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer 2004 Mercury Mountaineer
Make Chevrolet Mercury
Model TrailBlazer Mountaineer
Year Released 2009 2004
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4161 cc 4605 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 281 HP 240 HP
Torque 276 Nm 382 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.3:1 9.4:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1549 kg 2009 kg
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4850 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1850 mm 1820 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2900 mm
Fuel Consumption 11.2 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 15.7 L/100km 15.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 13.8 L/100km 14.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 83 L 85 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]