2009 Chevrolet Trans Sport vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Trans Sport is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Trans Sport. (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Trans Sport. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 321 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Trans Sport. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Trans Sport. (283 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Trans Sport.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Trans Sport | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Trans Sport | Armada |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3350 cc | 5555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 283 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 92 mm |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1953 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.9 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 106 L |