2009 Chevrolet Traverse vs. 1979 Mazda 626
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Traverse is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Traverse weights approximately 216 kg more than 1979 Mazda 626.
Because 1979 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Traverse | 1979 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Traverse | 626 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 281 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2520 mm |