2009 Chevrolet Traverse vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Traverse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse (288 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Traverse weights approximately 779 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse (366 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Traverse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Traverse | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
Model | Traverse | 102 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2160 mm |