2009 Chevrolet Traverse vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru R2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru R2 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Traverse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse (288 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Traverse weights approximately 427 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Traverse is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Subaru R2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse (366 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (103 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Traverse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Traverse | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Subaru |
Model | Traverse | R2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Crossover | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 834 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 30 L |