2009 Chevrolet Traverse vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Traverse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse (281 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ranger. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 381 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Traverse.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse (361 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Ranger. (251 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet Traverse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Traverse | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Traverse | Ranger |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Crossover | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 281 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 361 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1642 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 74 L |