2009 Chevrolet Traverse vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse (281 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (270 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 808 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Traverse.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Traverse. (361 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Traverse.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Traverse | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Traverse | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Crossover | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 281 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 361 Nm | 434 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1953 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 87 L |