2009 Chevrolet Traverse vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Rover 75 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Traverse is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 274 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Traverse.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Traverse is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse (366 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Traverse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Traverse | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Traverse | 75 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 366 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 65 L |