2009 Chevrolet Traverse vs. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo
To start off, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chevrolet Traverse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chevrolet Traverse would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo weights approximately 1 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Traverse.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo (540 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Traverse. (366 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Traverse.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Traverse | 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Lamborghini |
| Model | Traverse | Gallardo |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 8000 RPM |
| Torque | 366 Nm | 540 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4345 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1184 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 12.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 20.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 80 L |
