2009 Chrysler 300 vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2009 Chrysler 300 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,645 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler 300 (335 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 300 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 1150 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler 300 (525 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 444 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler 300 | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Chrysler | Suzuki |
| Model | 300 | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 5645 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 525 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2250 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 66 L |
