2009 Chrysler 300 vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2009 Chrysler 300 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler 300 (242 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 960 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler 300 | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Chrysler | Zastava |
Model | 300 | 850 K |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 848 cc |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2010 mm |