2009 Chrysler 300 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Chrysler 300 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler 300 (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 1103 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler 300 (340 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler 300 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Chrysler | Zastava |
Model | 300 | 102 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1873 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2160 mm |