2009 Chrysler 300 vs. 2000 Ford e-Ka
To start off, 2009 Chrysler 300 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford e-Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford e-Ka would be higher. At 5,645 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler 300 (335 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 702 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler 300 (525 Nm) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (190 Nm). This means 2009 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler 300 | 2000 Ford e-Ka | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | e-Ka |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5645 cc | 1758 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 525 Nm | 190 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2730 mm |