2009 Chrysler 300 vs. 2004 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2009 Chrysler 300 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 6,059 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler 300 (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 293 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Neon. (132 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 702 kg more than 2004 Dodge Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Chrysler 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Chrysler 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler 300 (570 Nm) has 394 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Neon. (176 Nm). This means 2009 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler 300 | 2004 Dodge Neon | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | 300 | Neon |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6059 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 425 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 103 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1873 kg | 1171 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.5 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.2 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.8 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 47 L |