2009 Chrysler 300 vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2009 Chrysler 300 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,645 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler 300 (335 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-350. (255 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 512 kg more than 2009 Chrysler 300.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler 300 (525 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-350. (475 Nm). This means 2009 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler 300 | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | E-350 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5645 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 525 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 2422 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 132 L |