2009 Chrysler 300 vs. 2005 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2009 Chrysler 300 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 6,059 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler 300 (424 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 292 more horse power than 2005 Dodge Neon. (132 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2005 Dodge Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 844 kg more than 2005 Dodge Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Chrysler 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Chrysler 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler 300 (569 Nm) has 393 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Dodge Neon. (176 Nm). This means 2009 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler 300 | 2005 Dodge Neon | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | 300 | Neon |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6059 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 424 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 569 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 103 mm | 87.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2035 kg | 1191 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.3 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 47 L |