2009 Chrysler 300 vs. 2005 Zastava 103

To start off, 2009 Chrysler 300 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Zastava 103. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Zastava 103 would be higher. At 5,645 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler 300 (335 HP) has 276 more horse power than 2005 Zastava 103. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2005 Zastava 103. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 990 kg more than 2005 Zastava 103. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler 300 (525 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 437 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Zastava 103. (88 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Zastava 103. 2009 Chrysler 300 has automatic transmission and 2005 Zastava 103 has manual transmission. 2005 Zastava 103 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chrysler 300 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: