2009 Chrysler 300 vs. 2006 Nissan M
To start off, 2009 Chrysler 300 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan M would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Nissan M is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Chrysler 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Chrysler 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan M, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler 300 (510 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan M. (462 Nm). This means 2009 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan M.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler 300 | 2006 Nissan M | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | 300 | M |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 4500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 462 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1830 mm |