2009 Chrysler 300 vs. 2010 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2010 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 6,059 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler 300 (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 322 more horse power than 2010 Daewoo Rezzo. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2010 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 526 kg more than 2010 Daewoo Rezzo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Chrysler 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Chrysler 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler 300 (570 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 428 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Daewoo Rezzo. (142 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Daewoo Rezzo. 2009 Chrysler 300 has automatic transmission and 2010 Daewoo Rezzo has manual transmission. 2010 Daewoo Rezzo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chrysler 300 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler 300 | 2010 Daewoo Rezzo | |
| Make | Chrysler | Daewoo |
| Model | 300 | Rezzo |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6059 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 425 HP | 103 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 103 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 81.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1873 kg | 1347 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.8 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |
