2009 Chrysler 300 vs. 2010 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2010 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler 300 (360 HP) has 207 more horse power than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 2009 Chrysler 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Chrysler 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler 300 (527 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa. (237 Nm). This means 2009 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler 300 | 2010 Daewoo Tocsa | |
Make | Chrysler | Daewoo |
Model | 300 | Tocsa |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 360 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 527 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |